Impeachment complaint batok VP Sara, gideklarar sa Korte Suprema nga unconstitutional!

GIDEKLARAR sa Korte Suprema ang ikaupat nga impeachment complaint batok Vice President Sara Duterte nga unconstitutional!!
Tungod nakalapas kini sa one year rule.
Ang desisyon sa Korte Suprema, base sa consolidated petition nga gisang-at sa Duterte, Atty. Israelito Torreon ug uban pa nga nagtinguha sa pagdeklarar sa articles of impeachment batok sa bise-Presidente nga null and void.
Apan giklaro ni Supreme Court Spokesperson Camille Ting, nga ang desisyon sa Korte Suprema wala nag-abswelto sa tulubagon sa bise-Presidente.
Mahimo nga magsang-at og bag-ong impeachment complaint batok sa bise-Presidente sugod Pebrero 6, 2026.

“…The respondent in the impeachment complaint should have been given a chance to be heard on the articles of impeachment and the supporting evidence to prove the charges prior to its transmittal to the Senate, despite the number of endorsements from House members. The House of Representatives must be given reasonable time to reach their independent decision of whether they will endorse an impeachment complaint. The court, however, has the power to review whether this period is sufficient, but petitioner, who invokes the court’s power to review, should prove that officials failed to perform their duties properly. 6th, the basis of any charge must be for impeachable acts or omissions committed in relation to their office and during the current term of the impeachable officer. For the president and vice president, these acts must be sufficiently grave, amounting to the crimes described in Article 11, Section 2, or a betrayal of public trust given by the majority of the electorate, other impeachable officers. The act must be sufficiently grave that they undermine and outweigh the respect for their constitutional independence and autonomy. And 7th to ensure that respondent in the impeachment complaint is heard under the requirements of due process in the procedure under Article 11, Section 3 paragraph 4, the House of Representatives is required to provide a copy of the Articles of Impeachment and its accompanying evidence to the Respondent to give him or her an opportunity to respond within a reasonable period to be determined by the House rules. The Constitution only requires an opportunity to be heard. It is up to the Respondent to waive this fundamental right and opt to present his or her evidence at the Senate trial…”
Supreme Court Spokesperson Camille Ting

Samtang, gi-aghat ni Presidential Communications Office kon PCO Undersecretary Atty. Claire Castro sa publiko nga respetohon ang desisyon sa Korte Suprema ug mosalig sa institusyon sa gobyerno.

SOURCE: INQUIRER NET/GMA NEWS
Photo:Diskurso PH